Pricing Table Particle

Quickly drive clicks-and-mortar catalysts for change
  • Basic
  • Standard Compliant Channels
  • $50
  • Completely synergize resource taxing relationships via premier market
  • 1 GB of space
  • Support at $25/hour
  • Sign Up
  • Premium
  • Standard Compliant Channels
  • $100
  • Completely synergize resource taxing relationships via premier market
  • 10 GB of space
  • Support at $15/hour
  • Sign Up
  • Platinum
  • Standard Compliant Channels
  • $250
  • Completely synergize resource taxing relationships via premier market
  • 30 GB of space
  • Support at $5/hour
  • Sign Up

Login Module

Breaking Stories

Class society DNV GL has released fourth edition of its Maritime Forecast to 2050, now anticipating hydrogen will not be among the leading fuels of the future for shipping.

Looking at 16 different fuel types, the DNV GL investment position in LNG was reflected, with fossil fuel-based LNG expected to gain a significant share until regulations tighten in 2030 or 2040. By 2050, e-ammonia, blue ammonia and bio-methanol were deemed most promising carbon-neutral fuels. Limited uptake of hydrogen as a ship fuel was predicted (as a result of both the estimated price of the fuel and the investment costs for the engine and fuel systems), but may serve in the production of several carbon-neutral fuels such as e-ammonia, blue ammonia, and e-methanol.


Find additional details at the link below: 

Despite some promising R&D efforts by Japanese shipping interests, at a national level, Japan's disproportionately influential role as chair of the MEPC (Marine Environment Protection Committee) is now sitting in the shadow of the disastrous oil spill in the Indian Ocean jurisdiction of Mauritius, with several Japanese Government agencies and companies, as well as the IMO and other oil industry bodies, meant to oversee the clean-up effort.

Global shipping subsidizes the entire oil industry through operating on heavy fuel oil, and what isn't burned off, emitting immense amounts of carbon dioxide and other pollutants, is leaked into the ocean with regularity across the international fleet. If shipping did not take this heavy fuel oil at a value of ~US$150b/year, the oil industry would have to pay to dispose of it safely. As a subsidy for the entire oil industry, it provides refineries with a revenue stream in a market with lax environmental controls

Madeline Rose, Climate Campaign Director, Pacific Environment highlights the irony of voluntary self-regulation. “The shipping industry is living on a different planet. They continue to oppose 100% decarbonization by 2050, when the health of our planet requires that they fully decarbonize by 2035.” 

Japan's stance at the IMO involves lobbying for the shipping sector's giant 1 billion tonnes of annual greenhouse gas emissions (which would place it as 6th in the country rankings), to be allowed to keep rising in absolute terms for at least another decade, in violation of Japan's own signing of the Paris Agreement.


Other details are available in the extensive article featured through the link below: 

Efforts under the partnership between MCST and Swire Shipping have been highlighted in an article published today by the Global Maritime Forum. 

Please find the full feature at the link below: 

What does a sustainable ocean economy look like by 2030? The World Ocean Initiative assesses industries including seafood, shipping, tourism and renewable energy in its latest report. It also claims:

"Decarbonising the global shipping fleet is the greatest sustainability challenge facing shipping companies, creating a trillion-dollar opportunity for investment in zero-carbon fuel and engine technologies to 2030 and beyond. In doing so, the industry has a pivotal role to play in decarbonising energy use in the wider economy."

The problem is that there is no consensus in the shipping industry over which low-carbon alternative fuel to switch to. For transporting cargo long distances across the ocean, ammonia appears to be the front-runner. Alternative low- and zero-carbon fuels are 2-3 times as expensive as heavy fuel oil. A price on carbon is probably one of the best ways to close that gap.

To fully decarbonise shipping by 2050, investment totalling $1.4trn-1.9trn is needed, mostly in the fuels supply chain developing low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia. Sustainably produced hydrogen is likely to have many additional uses in a greener economy.

Shipping has potential to be a catalyst that brings scale to the deployment of zero-emission fuels and enable a broader energy transition in other sectors

Johannah Christensen

Managing director,

Global Maritime Forum 

Explore the other aspects of the ocean economy which must be addressed and safeguarded over the coming decade and read the full report here: